News and Events
The issues before the Texas Supreme Court were 1) how much detail does a trial court have to give to be clear and specific and 2) are those reasons reviewable by an appellate court. United's position is that boilerplate language of a jury's verdict being against the great weight and preponderance of the evidence is not specific and does not inform the party how the jury "got it wrong." United also argued that the trial court's reason(s) should be reviewable in order to uphold a party's constitutional right to a jury trial and the resulting verdict. If the reasons won't be reviewed, then it "seems to be asking them to do something that's never going to matter after the fact."
Kathleen M. Kennedy started her litigation career as a prosecutor for the Gregg County District Attorney. She has been defending civil litgation cases since 2000 and has been with MehaffyWeber since 2007. Her practice includes a wide range of civil litigation with an emphasis on products liability, premises liability, medical malpractice, construction, energy, and personal injury cases. Kathleen has tried more than 50 cases to verdict as first chair in Brazoria, Gregg, Hardin, Harris, Jasper, Jefferson, Newton, Orange and Tyler Counties.
